top of page

CASE STUDY · GOOGLE MAPS ADD ON CONCEPT

Hiking Mode

A Google Maps add-on that makes the moment between driving and hiking feel confident, not confusing.

PROBLEM

Hikers juggle Maps to get there and AllTrails to hike it, and still arrive unsure of which entrance, which lot, which for.

SOLUTION

One add-on inside Google Maps: trailhead & parking guidance, on trail junction support, and a difficulty snapshot, surfaced before the hike starts.

IMPACT

Validated with 6 interviews + 5 usability tests 
confirmed the concept and exposed exactly where to clarify it.

MY ROLE

Solo UX/UI — research → tested prototype · ~80 hrs

Group 34.png

6

1:1 hiker interviews

3

core features shipped to hi-fi

5

moderated usability tests

~80

hrs

research through tested prototype

1

Discovery & Definition

DISCOVERY · EMPATHIZE · DEFINE

Google Maps gets you to the trail. It stops there.

Maps is already trusted for navigation — but the moment a destination becomes a trail instead of an address, it falls short. I chose to design inside Maps rather than build a new app, focused on the gap between driving and hiking.

→    Hikers juggle Maps + AllTrails for one trip

this part is kind of text heavy,  add mobile screen small? or too repeatative?

→    The stressful part often happens before the trail starts

→    Opportunity: build confidence, not just add navigation 

AllTrails

Mainstream trail discovery, strong community & conditions data.

Gaia GPS

Remote area GPS, offline first, built for experienced navigators.

Komoot

Turn by turn route planning & multiday trips.

onX Backcountry

Deep terrain tools for backcountry & technical routes.

Competitors

Six hikers, one shared moment of doubt.

"I parked half a mile away from the right trailhead — in Yosemite, of all places."

JOHN

"The trailhead pin was off the road, so I drove around looking for the entrance."

ANA

6 semi-structured interviews across experience levels · pattern: wayfinding from road to trail creates more stress than the hike itself.

The insight that shaped everything.

"

KEY INSIGHT

The hardest part isn't the trail, it's getting to it and knowing what to expect.

Trevor

PREPARED PERFORMANCE HIKER

Wants accurate route & condition data so he can plan efficiently and avoid avoidable mistakes.

May

CAUTIOUS BEGINNER HIKER

Needs simple, reassuring guidance, "if I know where to go, I can relax and enjoy the hike."

Megan

EVERYDAY SCENIC PLANNER

Wants hiking to feel calm, clear parking, entrances, and route expectations before she arrives.

2

Design

IDEATION · WIREFRAMES · PROTOTYPE

Three features, prioritized by real research-not feature creep.

P1

Trailhead & Parking Guidance

Wants accurate route & condition data so he can plan efficiently and avoid avoidable mistakes.

P1

On-Trail Route & Junction Guidance

Extra clarity at forks and connectors, where hikers second guess themselves most.

P1

Difficulty & Conditions
Snapshot

Surfaces difficulty, distance, elevation and conditions before commitment, not buried in a report.

The real challenge: separating "before" from "during."

Early drafts blurred pre-hike info with on-trail guidance, which made the feature feel cluttered. I had to be deliberate about labeling, grouping, and timing — when information should appear, not just what to include.

FLOWSTATE.jpg

User flow (click to enlarge)

Hiking Mode Low-Fidelity Wireframe V1 (2).jpg

Low fidelity wireframes

should i label all of them? 
Including the ones in pawport? since i want it to look clean?

1.1 Hike Search.png
1.2 Trail Selected.png
1.3 Direction Selected (6).png
1.4 Swipe Up.png

High Fidelity simplified

check spacing for captions inconsistant

Designed for one-handed, fast scanning on the trail.

Search

3.1 Hike Search.png

Difficulty surfaced early

Trailhead

2.3 Trail Guide Screen.png

Trail guide and Overview

On-trail

3.2 Conditions Selected.png

Conditions and surface type

3

Validation

TESTING · ITERATION · OUTCOME

The concept held. The structure needed sharpening.

5 moderated remote sessions across search, entering Hiking Mode, trail details, parking, and hike start. I measured completion, confusion/backtracking, and confidence, not just whether tasks were technically finished.

WHAT I TESTED

RESULT

Trail search & difficulty visibility

Clear, fast

Trailhead & parking guidance

Valued

Pre-hike vs. on-trail distinction

Needed separation 

Method — 5 moderated remote usability tests on high-fidelity prototypes, modeled on the 6 research participants.

Small clarity fixes, big confidence gains.

1

Parking folded into directions

It didn't need to stand alone, integrating it felt more natural.

2

Sharper pre-hike / on-trail split

Clarified labels and structure so the two moments stopped overlapping.

3

Bigger touch targets, earlier difficulty

Larger buttons, refined spacing, difficulty shown sooner in search results.

BEFORE
1.3 Direction Selected (5).png
AFTER
1.4 Swipe Up (1).png

Search results — before & after iteration - showing the scroll up - noticeable? important? 

OUTCOME

Clarity isn't polish, it's the feature.

Users didn't need Hiking Mode to do everything. They needed it to remove uncertainty at the exact moments it showed up: at the trailhead, at a fork, before committing to a trail.

6

hikers interviewed

3

features validated

5/5

usability sessions run

KEEP EXPLORING

Let's design something people trust.

View portfolio
RLOGO.png

© 2026 Ron Israel — UX / UI Designer

bottom of page